Clash of pragmatisms
It seems âthe pragmatism of Islamistsâ has defeated âthe Western pragmatism,â at the end of the day.
The western powers supported politics of the âconservativesâ in Muslim countries against the so-called âthreat of communism,â all along the Cold War years. The famous (or infamous) Prince Bandar bin Sultan of Saudi Arabia summarizes this well-known strategy better than anybody else, as he states, âSaudi efforts to fight the Communists were not limited to oil and petrodollar contributions for CIA covert operations.â Bandar maintains, âWe did not use East-West arguments or Americaâs anti-communism, we used religion. We said âthe Communists are atheists, they donât believe in religion and we are fighting them for religious reasons.ââ(William Simpson, The Prince, New York: Harper Collins, 2006, 112)
Indeed, it proved to be a working strategy and the western powers never thought their support of âMuslim politicsâ not only âsavedâ those countries from left wing politics or Soviet influence, but it also hindered the improvement of secular modern politics. At the end of the Cold War years, it turned to be supporting radical Islamism against the Soviet involvement in Afghanistan and moderate Islamism elsewhere (and especially in Turkey) against the possible influence of revolutionary Iran. Finally, after the end of the Cold War, Muslim politics were still needed; this time not only for avoiding âa clash of civilizations,â but also to enable the integration of Muslim societies into the global free market.
From the beginning, it was not only Western powers used conservatives against their (communist) enemies, but Muslim...
- Log in to post comments