"The goal was set earlier and Serbia was attacked"; "Then, Kissinger said..."

According to him, the goal was to seize part of the territory of Serbia, and the decision was made much earlier.
As he told Tanjug on the occasion of the anniversary of the NATO aggression, the attack of the North Atlantic Alliance aimed to get NATO a permanent base in the Balkans in order to implement the expansion strategy to the east.
"After the aggression against the FRY and the establishment of the Bondsteel military base, the USA and NATO established three military bases each in Bulgaria, Romania and Poland, the Baltic republics. Europe entered the process of militarization and adaptation to the needs of the war. This was the trigger for the militarization of overall relations in Europe", believes Jovanovi.
He said that the goals of the aggression continue to this day, and are reflected, as he says, in the most radical demands that Serbia give up Kosovo and Metohija and accept the ultimatum as an agreement.
"This causes concern not only in Serbia, but also in its surroundings, because nothing imposed can be treated as an agreement, regardless of the form. My deep conviction is that peace and stability in the Balkans cannot be built by new agreements outside of international law and outside the UN Charter, contrary to Resolution 1244, as a permanently valid document, and to the detriment of Serbia," said Jovanovi.
He points out that the aggression was carried out in direct violation of the UN Charter, the Founding Act of the NATO Pact from 1949 and the constitutions of the NATO member countries, because none of them sought approval from their parliament to enter the war against the FRY, and that it was started, as he states, with false accusations of mass human rights violations, desertions, crimes, the concentration of civilians...

Continue reading on: