Who is the rifle message addressed to?

I am not surprised at all because I was expecting it, because this was the tendency.

The president has ordered that this year?s Aug. 30 ceremonies be celebrated in a spectacular way. From what I understand, obeying the command of the chief commander, the general chief of staff began preparations for an official parade of soldiers carrying rifles. 

I was not surprised at all. A will which constructed a palace mightier than the Kremlin and openly declared that the regime has been changed de facto would have asked for military splendor parallel to this. 

I had no objection to such ceremonies in the past. I don?t have any today either. But they had their objections. That?s why I am asking, as I am curious about it. Only in the recent past were these glorious military parades seen as the fanfare of single-party rule. Why are they going back to these parades?  What was it that necessitated it today?

But the most important question is this:

What is the address of this message of this glorious parade of soldiers carrying rifles? 

-Will we say to the dismembered Syria, ?We will come and crush you??

-Will we warn Russia?

-Will we tell Greece, which cannot stand on its feet because of the economic crisis, to be careful?

Or?

Will this be a message to those who are not happy with the current state of affairs, those who objected to the presidential system and rejected it with their votes?

In short, where is this instruction for splendor, this anxiousness to show off, this tendency for exaggerated celebration coming from? Are you mumbling something to those outside or are you grumbling to us and trying to imply something?

Ballistic missiles in the parade?

I am also...